COPD Evidence Generation: Real-World Data Publication Strategy
Systematic publication program leveraging healthcare databases and collaborative research networks
Compliance Notice: This case study describes MedicalGoGo's service delivery processes and methodologies. No promotional claims about pharmaceutical products are made. All metrics refer to our operational performance. Content adheres to ABPI Code of Practice, EFPIA HCP Code, and MHRA guidelines.
Project Profile
Therapy Area: Respiratory (COPD)
Service Scope: Real-world evidence publication program
Geographic Coverage: Multi-country database analysis
Timeline: 18 months from evidence synthesis to final publications
Team Composition: 2 PhD epidemiologists, 3 medical writers, 1 statistical consultant, academic collaborators
Project Objective
Our client required comprehensive real-world evidence publication strategy for established COPD therapy. The engagement focused on generating robust real-world data analyses from healthcare databases across multiple countries, developing high-quality manuscripts for peer-reviewed publication, and creating congress presentation program targeting major respiratory conferences.
Specific objectives included:
- Systematic literature review identifying evidence gaps and publication opportunities
- Healthcare database analysis methodology development with academic collaborators
- Manuscript development for submission to high-impact respiratory journals
- Congress abstract preparation targeting ERS, ATS, and GOLD conferences
- Ensure full adherence to GPP3 (Good Publication Practice) and ICMJE guidelines
- Maintain complete transparency and scientific integrity throughout publication process
Our Methodological Approach
Phase 1: Evidence Gap Analysis (Months 1-3)
Systematic Literature Review:
Conducted comprehensive systematic review of published COPD literature using AI-powered literature monitoring combined with manual validation:
- 2,400+ publications screened across 5-year period
- 320 relevant studies identified for detailed analysis
- Systematic evidence mapping across clinical outcomes, patient populations, treatment patterns
- Gap analysis identifying underrepresented research areas
Publication Opportunity Identification:
Strategic assessment identified priority research questions:
- Long-term effectiveness in real-world clinical practice settings
- Treatment patterns and persistence across different healthcare systems
- Outcomes in special populations (elderly, comorbidities)
- Healthcare resource utilization and economic outcomes
- Safety profile in broader patient populations vs clinical trial participants
Database Selection & Access:
Evaluated and secured access to appropriate real-world data sources:
- Electronic health record databases (UK, Germany, US)
- Claims databases providing longitudinal patient data
- Disease registries with detailed clinical information
- Data access agreements and ethical approvals obtained
Phase 2: Research Design & Analysis (Months 4-10)
Study Protocol Development:
Designed rigorous observational research protocols for each planned analysis:
- Clear research objectives and hypothesis statements
- Appropriate study designs (cohort studies, case-control, cross-sectional)
- Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria
- Statistical analysis plans pre-specified before data access
- Bias mitigation strategies (propensity score matching, sensitivity analyses)
Academic Collaboration:
Established partnerships with leading respiratory medicine researchers:
- 6 academic institutions across 4 countries engaged
- Senior respiratory physicians as publication co-authors
- Statistical methodology experts for analysis validation
- Clear roles and contributions documented per ICMJE criteria
- Appropriate authorship acknowledgment and conflict of interest disclosure
Data Analysis Execution:
Systematic analytical process with quality controls:
- Statistical analysis following pre-specified plans
- Independent validation of key findings
- Sensitivity analyses assessing robustness
- Transparent handling of missing data
- Clear documentation of analytical decisions
Phase 3: Manuscript Development & Submission (Months 11-18)
Medical Writing Process:
High-quality manuscript development following publication best practices:
- First drafts: Developed by PhD medical writers with therapeutic expertise
- Scientific review: All co-authors provided substantive intellectual contribution
- Statistical review: Independent validation of results presentation
- Compliance review: Ensured appropriate transparency and disclosure
- Journal-specific formatting: Tailored to target journal requirements
Journal Selection Strategy:
Systematic targeting of appropriate publication venues:
- Tier 1 respiratory journals for primary analyses
- Specialty journals for specific patient populations
- Health economics journals for economic outcome studies
- Impact factor considerations balanced with audience reach
Congress Presentation Program:
Developed abstracts for major respiratory conferences:
- European Respiratory Society (ERS) Congress
- American Thoracic Society (ATS) International Conference
- GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) conferences
- National respiratory society meetings
- Poster and oral presentation materials prepared
Service Delivery Outcomes
Publication Success Metrics
- 12 peer-reviewed manuscripts submitted to high-impact respiratory journals
- 10 manuscripts accepted for publication (83% acceptance rate)
- 2 manuscripts under review at program completion
- Average impact factor: 6.8 across accepted publications
- 8 congress presentations delivered at major respiratory conferences
- 3 late-breaking abstracts accepted at premier conferences
Quality & Compliance Achievement
- 100% adherence to GPP3 guidelines across all publications
- Full ICMJE compliance - appropriate authorship criteria, COI disclosure, data sharing statements
- Complete transparency - all funding sources disclosed, author contributions specified
- Independent peer review - all manuscripts underwent journal peer review process
- No retractions or corrections - high-quality analytical rigor maintained
Operational Efficiency
- 18-month program duration from evidence synthesis to publication
- Average 8-week manuscript development from analysis completion to submission
- 40% cost efficiency vs traditional full-service medical communications agency
- Streamlined author coordination - systematic review processes minimizing revision cycles
- 95% author satisfaction - collaborative process valued by academic co-authors
Scientific Impact
- Substantial evidence contribution to COPD real-world outcomes literature
- Conference dissemination reaching 5,000+ respiratory specialists
- Ongoing academic relationships - continued collaborations established
- Knowledge advancement - novel insights on treatment effectiveness and safety
"MedicalGoGo's systematic approach to real-world evidence publication demonstrated exceptional understanding of both scientific rigor and publication ethics. Their medical writing quality, combined with meticulous attention to GPP3 guidelines and transparent collaboration practices, resulted in high-impact publications that genuinely advanced clinical knowledge. The efficiency didn't compromise quality - their process actually enhanced our publications through systematic methodology and expert statistical support."
Key Success Factors
- Systematic Evidence Gap Analysis: AI-enhanced literature review identified genuine publication opportunities
- Academic Collaboration: Partnerships with leading researchers enhanced credibility and scientific quality
- Rigorous Methodology: Pre-specified protocols and statistical rigor ensured publication acceptance
- Publication Ethics: Complete adherence to GPP3 and ICMJE guidelines from project inception
- Expert Medical Writing: PhD-level writers with therapeutic expertise produced high-quality manuscripts
- Strategic Journal Targeting: Appropriate venue selection balanced impact with audience relevance
Methodology Transferability
This engagement established replicable framework for evidence generation programs:
- Systematic Literature Review Methodology: AI-assisted screening with human validation
- Publication Planning Process: Evidence gap-driven opportunity identification
- Academic Partnership Model: Collaborative research maintaining scientific integrity
- Quality Assurance Framework: Multi-level review ensuring publication standards
- Compliance Integration: GPP3/ICMJE requirements embedded throughout workflow
Services Deployed
Discuss Your Evidence Generation Needs
Explore how our systematic publication methodology can support your real-world evidence strategy with scientific rigor and publication ethics excellence.
Schedule a Consultation